To some many of the characters of 1984 may have

        To some many of the reference works of 1984 may rich mortal seemed unnecessary. When you re solelyy vex thought to it and actually look into the bind, n genius of the characters seem to be of any lesser mensurate. All are important assets to 1984, and they all are tied in actually well.

        The characters of lesser value sincerely dont exist. All add to the book quite clearly and make it flow. Parsons and his family are a blossoming example. Parsons wife would always ask for Winstons help, viewing that Parsons himself was never really around or at that place for the family. Parsonss children to a fault left something to be give tongue to. His kids symbolize that literally no one should be trusted. Parsonss daughter tells on him to the thought police, in our world today a child would rarely lock in a family member. Without this in the book I dont think the realization of how much stupendous Brother is organism enforced is beingness made.

        Katherine also proves obedience within bountiful Brother. Katherine is perceived in this novel as someone who lives entirely for the sake of outstanding Brother and the ships company. Katherine is also the kind of soul who really has no self worth. Who is to say that this is not the mark of the Party and Big Brother? Without Katherine in the novel we would sire never have humpn how Winston thought of sex. The two of them being united and hook up with is yet another way of showing how Big Brother is so controlling. Without Big Brother there these two plurality would have never found their selves married to one another, they are two completely different pot with extremely different views on things. The only thing Katherine precious to do is please the party, and do good for the party. Katherines primary(prenominal) goal in life was to obey the party, whereas Winston rebelled.

        Mr. Charrington, he seems to be a very charming individual who wants to help those stuck with Big Brother. Mr. Charrington, perceived as a prole to Winston and Julia was the last person they thought would betray them. It probably never even cut through their minds that he was part of the thought police, let alone OBrian. Mr. Charrington is a small character in the novel, but really turns out to be one of the biggest parts of 1984, and defiantly the approximately shocking. Without Mr. Charrington Winston and Julia would have never gotten the little room above the shop, they would have never grown so fond of each other, and most importantly of all they would have never been caught. Again the character of Me. Charrington shows just how big and powerful the party really is.



The Party is so powerful that they can watch someone for so long that they know exactly what they will do next, and they know just what to do to trick them into being caught. Which is exactly what happened in Winstons place.

        Syme on the other hand was a very tiny character, only mentioned once or twice. The significance of Symes slicing is unbelievable. Syme was one of the smart ones, who really knew what was going on, the Party had no reason not to vaporize him. He could have been a threat to the Party and Big Brother. Syme could have informed tribe of what he knew, and really taken big brother down.

        In the end all that is really left to be said is that all the characters in this novel were necessary, the small things that happened within these people really made what the book is. Throughout the characters George Orwell was able to show how important and powerful Big Brother really was, and how Big Brother could manipulate and change anything what so ever. If these Characters were not include in the book, how would have it turned out?

If you want to experience a full essay, order it on our website: Orderessay



If you want to get a full information about our service, visit our page: How it works.